Monthly Archives: January 2017

Tax efficient saving – right place, right time and right order

Tax-incentivised, tax-free, or potentially tax-free are some of the savings choices on offer. Failing to make the most of these will mean you may pay unnecessary tax on income and savings. However, saving into the right tax wrappers at the right time, and crucially in the right order, can limit the tax paid.

The introduction of new tax-free allowances means that there is now greater scope to save and pay little or no tax on those savings. The new £5,000 dividend allowance and £1,000 personal savings allowance bring the total tax free allowances available in 2016/17 to £33,100.

Tax-incentivised savings such as pensions, and tax-free wrappers such as ISAs, are clearly preferable to savings which are potentially taxable. Consequently, when deciding where to save these should always be the first choice.

But pensions and ISAs come with a savings cap. The tax relief on pensions funding is controlled by earnings, the annual allowance and lifetime allowance. There is also a maximum subscription limit of £15,240 (rising to £20,000 from 2017/18) on ISA saving.

Once these pots have been maximised it may still be possible to achieve similar tax efficient returns on other investments with a little bit of careful management of allowances of course.

Unit trusts and OEICs The new dividend allowance creates an opportunity for virtually tax-free saving by building up a collective portfolio where income tax and capital gains tax can be ‘managed out’ by using the respective allowances.

This can be achieved by keeping dividend income to below £5,000 a year, and realising capital gains annually from the portfolio within the annual CGT exemption (£11,100 for 2016/17).

The portfolio value at which no tax will be due will, of course, depend on investment returns, but they could look something like this if allowances are fully used:

Portfolio size Dividend Yield Tax free income Cap. growth rate Tax free growth
£200,000 2.5% £5,000 5.5% £11,100
£400,000 1.25% £5,000 2.75% £11,100
£500,000 1% £5,000 2.22% £11,100

The order of saving For those who use their tax incentives and allowances efficiently, the order in which they are most likely to fill their savings pots is:

  1. Pensions The combination of tax relief on contributions, no tax on income/gains within the pension fund and 25 per cent tax-free cash make pensions difficult to beat as a means of long-term saving.
  2. ISAs Similarly, investments within an ISA do not suffer tax on income and gains. In addition, the ISA can be accessed at any time without giving rise to a tax charge.
  3. Unit trust/OEICs Building up a portfolio so that dividends and gains can be kept within the available allowances can create a fund which is potentially tax free.
  4. Offshore Bonds Income and gains within an offshore bond enjoy gross roll up and are tax-deferred rather than tax free. But there is the potential for them to be tax free if gains can be taken when clients’ or their intended beneficiaries are non-taxpayers.

The tax saved helps to optimise returns and this, combined with reducing the management charges for investment, means that you keep more of what you’ve saved to spend or pass on to your families.

 

Why sissies make great investors

I was recently forwarded this article by Robin Powell of Regis Media and thought it was worth sharing the contents.

A funny thing happened the day after Christmas.  An unknown rookie basketball player by the name of Chinanu Onuaku stepped up to the free throw line and threw the ball underarm, or “granny style”, towards the hoop. The crowd gasped and then erupted as he scored the point.

Now, I’m less than six foot with a very rudimentary knowledge of basketball. But I’m reliably informed there is academic evidence that throwing the ball underarm gives the thrower the best possible chance of making a free throw. Until now, though, it hasn’t been seen in an NBA game since retirement of granny-style pioneer Rick Barry in 1980.

So, why did no professional basketball player until now try to replicate Barry’s success by perfecting the technique that is proven to deliver the best results?  According to Adam Kilgore in the Washington Post, “players uniformly resisted it, afraid of looking foolish, standing out as childish or unmanly”. Wilt Chamberlin, who briefly flirted with underarm free throws in the early 1960s, apparently reverted to the conventional style because he “felt like a sissy”.

There’s a very similar phenomenon to this in football. Ten years ago, Ofer H. Azar, an economist at Ben-Gurion University of Negev in Israel, conducted an experiment involving professional goalkeepers. What he wanted to find out was how they dealt with a high-stakes decision, namely what to do at a penalty kick, and whether it helped to explain the behaviour of investors faced with making similarly big decisions under pressure.

Azar’s research team analysed more than 300 kicks and concluded that the action that was most likely to prevent a goal being scored was, perhaps surprisingly, to stand in the middle of the goal and do nothing until the trajectory of the ball can be seen. This resulted in a success rate of one in three — far higher than the average.

But goalkeepers very rarely do that. Instead, they typically try to guess which way the ball is going to go before the player’s foot has actually made contact with it, diving left or right, to try to be in the right spot when the ball arrives. The researchers found that diving left resulted in success 14 per cent of the time, and diving right only 12.6 per cent.

Crucially, when they asked why the goalkeepers who took part in the experiment why they didn’t just stand and wait more often, it emerged that the overriding reason was the fear of what others would think of them. In particular, they didn’t want to give the impression to the crowd or their teammates that they weren’t trying or taking the situation sufficiently seriously.

What fascinates me is how analogous these two examples from the sporting world are to the response that many people have to evidence-based investing. It doesn’t matter how many times you tell them that this is a good way to invest or that is a bad way; some people will always act irrationally.

Humans are very much social animals. We pay huge attention to what others are doing, and to how other people perceive us. As a result, we’re often scared to do the opposite, even though we know, on a rational level, that’s just what we should be doing.

No, buy-and-hold indexing isn’t cool, it isn’t macho and it won’t make you the most interesting guest at a dinner party. But the evidence overwhelmingly tells us it’s the best way to invest.

Go on, be a sissy. And, as William Bernstein would say, “Let them laugh. The joke’s on them.”

Making Tough Decisions in an Uncertain World

Donald Rumsfeld, the former US defence secretary, certainly added to the lexicon of the concept of uncertainty with his infamous ‘known-knowns; known-unknowns; and unknown-unknowns’[i] interview, when describing the link between Al Qaeda and the Saddam regime in Iraq. While it confused many, it does provide us with a useful framework for understanding the uncertainty that we all face as we seek to put in place sensible plans for our finances, not least how to invest our liquid assets.

We face a number of critical decisions on our life journeys from young, family and career-orientated adults, through the inflection point of leaving the workforce and hopefully onto a happy, healthy, long and financially secure retirement. These include decisions such as: when to retire? How much is enough? How much can we spend? What should we invest in? Can we afford to gift the children some capital at this point?

The challenge we face is that these decisions are made against the backdrop of great uncertainty – in our lives, the capital markets and the rapidly changing world we live in. However, we must make those decisions if we are to give ourselves the best opportunity to achieve the things we aspire to do, with the wealth that we have. These sorts of decisions would be easy if we knew that we were going to die at the age of 99 and could obtain a return, year-in year-out, of say, 4 per cent above the rate of inflation!

But that is not the real world – our lives and the markets contain much more uncertainty than that. Perhaps the most valuable contribution that a good, unconflicted advisor can play now, and in the years ahead, is facilitating you to feel empowered to make the best decisions that you can in the face of this uncertainty. Let us take a look at this with a little help from Donald Rumsfeld, the former US defence secretary.

What are the ‘known-knowns’?

If we look at the ‘known-knowns’ we can come up with a list that acts as both a starting point and platform for making decisions. It includes:

  • How much wealth you have today, where it is and who owns it
  • Your current income and expenditure
  • Your current rates of income tax and potential inheritance tax liability
  • Your vision of what you want your money to achieve for you (financial security, help for the children, philanthropic works)
  • The principal options for investing it, which are simply being either to lend it to someone (bonds) or to become an owner of companies (equities)
  • The returns that have been exhibited on an historical basis for investing in bonds and equities of different kinds
  • The fact these returns do not come in straight lines
  • Some basic principals of investing that we know to work effectively.

What are the known-unknowns

Now we step into perhaps less comfortable territory, not least because we are faced with thinking about our own mortality:

  • We know we are going to die, but we do not know when, either in our own case or in the case of our partners or other family members
  • We know that life takes many turns and that the future that we envisage for ourselves may well not to be the one that we experience. As the old adage reminds us ‘Life is what happens to you when you are busy making plans’
  • We know that investment returns do not come in straight lines, but we do not have much of a clue as to what the returns on investment will be this year, next year or indeed over the lifetime for which we will be investing. We can make some sensible estimates, but these are by no means guaranteed
  • We know that there are some really smart investment professionals out there who could manage our money for us. The unknown is that we have no reliable means of identifying, with any certainty, who they are today
  • We know we could do with some help, but do not necessarily know who to turn to or who we can trust.

 

What are the unknown-unknowns

Well if we knew what they were, they would be ‘known-unknowns’. In the financial world, these potential events have become known as ‘Black Swans’. The phrase was coined by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his insightful book Fooled by Randomness[ii], which makes the point that just because most swans are white, it does not means that black swans do not exist. He describes a Black Swan event as “being beyond the realms of regular expectations; carrying extreme impact; and which is prone to us concocting spurious explanations as to why it happened and how it could have been predicted.”  Interestingly, he also views it as being the inverse – i.e. the non-occurrence of events that seem highly likely. What could these be?

  • A computer virus that wipes clean all electronic records of stock ownership?
  • A nuclear explosion at Fort Knox’s gold reserves (as was nearly experienced in James Bond’s Gold Finger).
  • That all financial assets deliver negative returns in the years ahead.
  • Others? Your guess is as good as ours.

How we incorporate these events into our thinking is taxing, but we must try and do what we can to ensure that we incorporate robustness and flexibility into our planning

Is there any help? (the quick answer is yes)

It is all very well working out our own Rumsfeldian list, but how does that help us to manage the uncertainty? The short answer is that it helps us to identify where the risks lie as we try and plan and to put in place sensible strategies to mitigate the unknowns that we face. It also illustrates the need to run a range of scenarios, in some instances, so that we can form some insight into what the various possible outcomes may be, where we draw our red lines, and what choices we face in these circumstances. This is where a professional financial planner adds considerable value.

Carpenter Rees exists to help its clients make these decisions with clarity and confidence in the face of the uncertainty of life and markets.

Insightful, structured, and yet flexible financial planning process, combined with a robust investment process, are the essential ingredients for maximising the chances of enjoying a financial outcome. This is turn provides a lifestyle, that is not only acceptable, but hoped for – ‘Yes you can still go to South Africa to play golf, again, this year.’

A sound process that helps to frame the problems that we face correctly helps us to make better decisions as a consequence.

The essential blend of financial planning and robust investment process

 Making Tough Decisions in an Uncertain World

Sound financial planning is, somewhat surprisingly, one of the best-kept secrets in the world of private finance. Akin to the preparation of a balance sheet, profit and loss statement and forward-looking management accounts, which allow companies to manage their assets, liabilities and cash flow into the future, financial planning does the same at an individual level.

Life-time cash flow modelling tools can help to gauge quantum and direction of decisions, and assist with scenario planning as needed. However, numerical precision needs to be avoided as it sets a false sense of certainty in an uncertain world.

Discussing the issues with an advisor, running a range of scenarios and gaining a sense of the likelihood of achieving the outcome you wish for (and the risks to it), helps most clients to feel much clearer and more comfortable about their wealth, their future and the decisions they may face along the way.

A good financial planning process helps to identify the three components that define how much investment risk a client needs to take: the first component is how much risk can they tolerate, which is a psychological trait; the second is defining their financial capacity for losses, which is a function of their wealth and future lifestyle needs; and the third is the financial risk that they need to take to achieve their goals. Discussing how to align these three components is one of the most important financial conversations that anyone will ever have. Only once this is agreed, can a sensible and suitable investment portfolio be structured.

In investing there are no absolute right or wrong answers, only better and worse solutions. Better solutions are founded in process that encompasses insight into the problem (what should we invest in), are focused on reducing uncertainty (with as little risk as possible) and a robust and consistent decision making process (should we go right or left at this decision point?) As Albert Einstein stated “Make it as simple as possible but no simpler”, which has been our mantra as we have built and implemented our evidence-based approach to investing. In essence, it encapsulates the following core principles:

  • Capitalism works and we should use it to do the heavy lifting as we try to generate returns from our portfolio as either owners (equities) or lenders (bonds). Finding the right balance between the two is key
  • Markets work pretty well – they are a zero-sum game before costs. The evidence tells us that few professionals ‘win’ over the sorts of time frame we are interested in and they are well-nigh impossible to identify in advance. Using ‘passive’ funds that seek to deliver the return of the markets make sense
  • The mix of assets we choose to hold dominates the return journey that we will experience – it is what we focus on
  • We seek to take risks carefully that deliver adequate rewards over time
  • We diversify all portfolios broadly; at the security, geography and asset class levels
  • We keep an eagle eye on costs of all kinds to ensure that you receive as much of the return on offer from the markets as possible
  • We rebalance this mix of risks regularly, back to the level of risk that is most appropriate for your circumstances

Whilst many would argue over Donald Rumsfeld’s political contribution, his framework for thinking about the great uncertainty that exists in our world, our lives and the capital markets is a useful one. In the face of this uncertainty, we need to use the ‘known-knowns’ as our starting point and the ‘known-unknowns’ as a basis for analysis and scenario planning to get a tighter handle on the possible range of future outcomes. The ‘unknown-unknowns’ are a reminder of the limitations of our knowledge and our need for flexibility and resilience. Sound financial planning and robust investment process are two key elements for managing this uncertainty.

We hope that you have enjoyed this paper. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or comments on it.

Priorities and Concerns of Family Businesses

A Happy New Year to you all.

At Carpenter Rees a great deal of our time is spent working with family businesses and therefore during 2016, to mark our commitment to the sector, we embarked on a research project with Manchester Metropolitan University’s Centre for Enterprise.

The initiative allowed us to gain a true insight into the aspirations of family businesses and will be instrumental in our work to help our clients reach financial freedom and achieve succession.

We are delighted that the research paper is now available to download from our home page. The research includes findings from a workshop held with some of our family business clients, as well as advisors that we often work alongside such as accountants, lawyers, finance and banking specialists, PR and marketing consultants and a management trainer.

We will continue to provide additional information in the area of family business over the coming months but in the meantime please do download the research paper, and of course, please share this with anybody who you feel would be interested.